Theatre naturally lends itself to moving through worlds.
The etymology of the word ‘theatre’ has architectural connotations – it comes
from the Ancient Greek word for the ‘place of seeing’. That place is quite
specific, connected with architecture, but not necessarily bound within it. Although
this is challenged by today's theatre artists treating place quite loosely
(site-specific theatre, for example) and also exploring the flexibility of form
(participatory theatre, for example). In its western form, theatre is a place facilitating a constructed reality.
Such that, perhaps, visiting the theatre today, one is not even moving through
cohesive 'worlds' anymore, but experiencing something like a multi-track
reality, that the individual desperately tries to fuse into a harmonic whole.
All this to say, by the end of the Voila! Festival, your correspondent
couldn't shake the feeling that maybe he had moved through a few too many
realities than a capable physician would recommend. The chaotic fusion of
politics and art that was my experience at
COP 23 in Germany (containing its
own strange geopolitical displacement of Fiji and Germany effectively sharing
the event, or if you view it more cynically, as I did, Germany hosting the
event and Fiji unfortunately playing the role of some exotic, symbolic window-dressing) was
replaced with the Euro-UK project of
Voila!, which itself took me
through some of the more distant areas of highly diverse London, and some
equally kaleidoscopic staged ontologies.
It's fair to say that I was pretty spent by the end, magnified by the usual
problems of not being paid for much of it, this type of labour being seen as
largely valueless in contexts that favour labour that creates material wealth
directly, or is involved with other types of more fashionable simulation such
as IT. Compounding that is my own increasingly fluid categorisation, moving
between nation states, residing in some, speaking the language of others,
sometimes doing that badly. Draw from social security? Ha, good one. Ask a
neighbour for help? Don't count on it. Get that random 10 euros back that you
were charged for withdrawing 20 pounds? Doubtful.
But you can afford it, right?
I'm certainly not alone in this state of transience and permanent
negotiation with dominant structures over which I have virtually no control, as
was proven in almost every show that I saw in
Voila!. It’s also a
precarious time for the festival itself – perched uncertainly within the UK’s
decision to leave the European Union, it finds itself thrust into a quasi-activist
platform, where even existing as a European becomes something of a protest.
I’ve always found the UK’s relationship with Europe strange, one of total
interdependence mixed with fierce proclamations of autonomy. Expect nothing to
change on that front. For the theatre, which benefits hugely from intercultural
exchange and diversity, there are challenges ahead.
Some of these I outlined in a practical/theoretical workshop in London’s
Cockpit Theatre, entitled
Performing Europe's Non-Withdrawal: Crises of Environment and Identity at COP 23, and part of the
Voila! Festival. The event was essentially a demonstration of the work from Bonn, with a performance of
Gaia by Canadian writer Hiro Kanagawa, acted out by Shaila Alvarez and ably supported by Frank McHugh, who had earlier performed in (and in the case of McHugh, organised) a Climate Change Theatre Action in London earlier in the week. We finished with a short demonstration of the exercises which were used to demonstrate material in Bonn.
The full text of my presentation, is available
here.